
I chose to do the IAT for the participant observer blog. I chose to do the religion and the gender-career IATs. The religion IAT was not exactly consistant with my conscious beliefs, as the IAT showed me as having a preference of Judaism over other religions, but I do not have a preference to any religion. The gender-career IAT showed me as associating males with careers and females with family, but I do not associate either male or females with only one of these aspects consciuosly. I feel that it is most likely that the reason for the results I obtained in both of the tests was due to the fact that I did not take the time to properly associate the appropriate letter on the keyboard with the headings to assign the words to. I believe that the IAT is showing cultural associations more than anything. I do not feel that the results of the IAT changed my feelings about prejudice and stereotypes. I don’t believe that it changed the way I feel about religion because I do not claim a religion and I feel that although all religions do have a few good ideas to them they are still just human constructs that are inherently flawed. I feel that the IAT did not change my feelings on the gender and its association with careers and family, because I know that it is common for women to be associated with family and men to be associated with work outside of the house. The test that I chose to retake was the gender-career IAT because the results were the opposite of my conscious beliefs. I took more time to remember the positioning of the titles at the top of the page that I was supposed to associate the words with befoe starting the association task, and managed to change my results to my conscious beliefs. All in all I do not think that the IAT is a valid measure of a persons beliefs.
No comments:
Post a Comment